CACI No. 373. Common Count: Account Stated

Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2024 edition)

Bg115

373 . Common Count: Account Stated

An account stated is an agreement between the parties, based on prior

transactions between them establishing a debtor -creditor relationship,

that a particular amount is due and owing fr om the debtor to the

creditor . The agr eement may be oral, in writing, or implied fr om the

parties’ words and conduct.

[ Name of plaintiff ] claims that [ name of defendant ] owes

[him/her/ nonbinary pr onoun /it] money on an account stated. T o establish

this claim, [ name of plaintiff ] must prove all of the following:

1. That [ name of defendant ] owed [ name of plaintiff ] money from

previous financial transactions;

2. That [ name of plaintiff ] and [ name of defendant ], by words or

conduct, agreed that the amount that [ name of plaintiff ] claimed to

be due from [ name of defendant ] was the correct amount owed;

3. That [ name of defendant ], by words or conduct, promised to pay

the stated amount to [ name of plaintiff ];

4. That [ name of defendant ] has not paid [ name of plaintiff ] [any/all]

of the amount owed under this account; and

5. The amount of money [ name of defendant ] owes [ name of plaintiff ].

New December 2005; Revised November 2019

Sources and Authority

• “ ‘An account stated is an agreement, based on prior transactions between the

parties, that the items of an account are true and that the balance struck is due

and owing. [Citation.] T o be an account stated, “it must appear that at the time

of the statement an indebtedness from one party to the other existed, that a

balance was then struck and agreed to be the correct sum owing from the debtor

to the creditor , and that the debtor expressly or impliedly promised to pay to the

creditor the amount thus determined to be owing.” [Citation.]’ ” ( Leighton v .

Forster (2017) 8 Cal.App.5th 467, 491 [213 Cal.Rptr .3d 899].)

• “The essential elements of an account stated are: (1) previous transactions

between the parties establishing the relationship of debtor and creditor; (2) an

agreement between the parties, express or implied, on the amount due from the

debtor to the creditor; (3) a promise by the debtor , express or implied, to pay the

amount due.” ( Zinn v . Fred R. Bright Co. (1969) 271 Cal.App.2d 597, 600 [76

Cal.Rptr . 663], internal citations omitted.)

• “The agreement of the parties necessary to establish an account stated need not

be express and frequently is implied from the circumstances. In the usual

Bg116

situation, it comes about by the creditor rendering a statement of the account to

the debtor . If the debtor fails to object to the statement within a reasonable time,

the law implies his agreement that the account is correct as rendered.” ( Zinn,

supra, 271 Cal.App.2d at p. 600, internal citations omitted.)

• “An account stated is an agreement, based on the prior transactions between the

parties, that the items of the account are true and that the balance struck is due

and owing from one party to another . When the account is assented to, ‘ “it

becomes a new contract. An action on it is not founded upon the original items,

but upon the balance agreed to by the parties. . . .” Inquiry may not be had into

those matters at all. It is upon the new contract by and under which the parties

have adjusted their dif ferences and reached an agreement.’ ” ( Gleason v . Klamer

(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 782, 786-787 [163 Cal.Rptr . 483], internal citations

• “T o be an account stated, ‘it must appear that at the time of the statement an

indebtedness from one party to the other existed, that a balance was then struck

and agreed to be the correct sum owing from the debtor to the creditor , and that

the debtor expressly or impliedly promised to pay to the creditor the amount

thus determined to be owing.’ The agreement necessary to establish an account

stated need not be express and is frequently implied from the circumstances.

When a statement is rendered to a debtor and no reply is made in a reasonable

time, the law implies an agreement that the account is correct as rendered.

Actions on accounts stated frequently arise from a series of transactions which

also constitute an open book account. However , an account stated may be found

in a variety of commercial situations. The acknowledgement of a debt consisting

of a single item may form the basis of a stated account. The key element in

every context is agreement on the final balance due.” ( Maggio, Inc. v . Neal

(1987) 196 Cal.App.3d 745, 752-753 [241 Cal.Rptr . 883], internal citations

• “An account stated need not be submitted by the creditor to the debtor . A

statement expressing the debtor ’ s assent and acknowledging the agreed amount

of the debt to the creditor equally establishes an account stated.” ( T ruestone, Inc.

v . Simi W est Industrial Park II (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 715, 726 [209 Cal.Rptr .

757], internal citations omitted.)

• “ ‘The common count is a general pleading which seeks recovery of money

without specifying the nature of the claim . . . . Because of the uninformative

character of the complaint, it has been held that the typical answer , a general

denial , is suf ficient to raise almost any kind of defense, including some which

ordinarily require special pleading.’ However , even where the plaintif f has

pleaded in the form of a common count, the defendant must raise in the answer

any new matter , that is, anything he or she relies on that is not put in issue by

the plaintif f.” ( T itle Ins. Co. v . State Bd. of Equalization (1992) 4 Cal.4th 715,

731 [14 Cal.Rptr .2d 822, 842 P .2d 121], internal citations and footnote omitted.)

• “The account stated may be attacked only by proof of ‘fraud, duress, mistake, or

other grounds cognizable in equity for the avoidance of an instrument.’ The

CACI No. 373 CONTRACTS

Bg117

defendant ‘will not be heard to answer when action is brought upon the account

stated that the claim or demand was unjust, or invalid.’ ” ( Gleason, supra, 103

Cal.App.3d at p. 787, internal citations omitted.)

• “An account stated need not cover all the dealings or claims between the parties.

There may be a partial settlement and account stated as to some of the

transactions.” ( Gleason, supra, 103 Cal.App.3d at p. 790, internal citation

• “In the common law action of general assumpsit, it is customary to plead an

indebtedness using ‘common counts.’ In California, it has long been settled the

allegation of claims using common counts is good against special or general

demurrers. The only essential allegations of a common count are ‘(1) the

statement of indebtedness in a certain sum, (2) the consideration, i.e., goods

sold, work done, etc., and (3) nonpayment.’ ” ( Farmers Ins. Exchange v . Zerin

(1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 445, 460 [61 Cal.Rptr .2d 707], internal citations omitted.)

• “A common count is not a specific cause of action, . . . rather , it is a simplified

form of pleading normally used to aver the existence of various forms of

monetary indebtedness, including that arising from an alleged duty to make

restitution under an assumpsit theory . When a common count is used as an

alternative way of seeking the same recovery demanded in a specific cause of

action, and is based on the same facts, the common count is demurrable if the

cause of action is demurrable.” ( McBride v . Boughton (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th

379, 394 [20 Cal.Rptr .3d 115], internal citations omitted.)

Secondary Sources

4 W itkin, California Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Pleading, § 561

1 W itkin, Summary of California Law (1 1th ed. 2017) Contracts, §§ 1003, 1004

1 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. 8, Accounts Stated and Open

Accounts , §§ 8.10, 8.40-8.46 (Matthew Bender)

1 Matthew Bender Practice Guide: California Contract Litigation, Ch. 9, Seeking or

Opposing Quantum Meruit or Quantum V alebant Recovery in Contract Actions ,

9.02, 9.15, 9.32

CONTRACTS CACI No. 373

Page last reviewed May 2024

Samuel Estreicher Klara Nedrelow

NYU Law professor Samuel Estreicher and 3L Klara Nedrelow analyze the International Court of Justice’s July 19, 2024 advisory opinion on Israel’s policies in the occupied Palestinian territories, focusing on the dissenting opinion of Judge Julia Sebutinde.

Lawyers - Get Listed Now! Get a free directory profile listing